Though this article’s content is incidental, I have spoken with employers about the workplace’s lack of civility. There is ample literature to support this perception. Employers say that incivility costs are escalating and reducing employee performance and creativity (Porath & Erez, 2007, 2009; Rafaeli et al., 2012) and retention (Lim, Cortina, & Magley, 2008; Porath & Pearson, 2012). In 2012 an estimated loss of $6 billion per year was due to workplace incivility. That number includes negative interactions between other employees and employers (Duffy, Scott, Shaw, Tepper, & Aquino, 2012).

Despite the understanding of incivility, costs associated with organizational well-being and individual gains have not increased. Behavior, regard for others in the workplace, and politeness (Andersson & Pearson, 1999) said in their study organizations and employees appear more dependent on positive norms, civil interactions (Andersson & Pearson, 1999). Nevertheless, research has raised skepticism about the potential individual benefits of civility. Instead, Andersson and Pearson (1999) said that being nice may increase friendships but being nice may not help or harm you in your career. Judge, Livingston, & Hurst (2012) believe there is a negative relationship between a person’s kindness and income. So, this principle is considered ambiguous because warm people are allegedly less competent (Cuddy, 2009), therefore likely to have negative career consequences. Research has shown that people who resist social rules and treat people disrespectfully garner more power (Pfeffer, 2013). Civil people are often perceived as fragile and overlooked or taken advantage of (Forni, 2002). Being kind, and considerate may be risky to one’s self-esteem, career, goal achievement, influence, and income (Forni, 2002; Judge et al., 2012). So, in consideration of this point of view, has civility lost its value in the workplace?

How can employers develop strategies to reduce incivility in the workplace? First, changing the culture is complex; everyone must be on board for the change. If incivility is the organization norm, leaders must consider best practices to change the culture. One size does not fit all. The solution should never be to construct incivility as a norm. Of course, politics should never be a part of seeking a civil workplace. Politics only drain the emotional health of employees and sets the organization up for eventual failure. Data that reflects turnover statistics can be the best tool to determine whether the workforce is healthy. According to (Porath 2016), leaders who understand civility as an effective strategy to promote civility in the workplace should demonstrate it front and center of making a positive change. A leader who can demonstrate kindness, encourage others to do the same.

Jacky Watson-Jolly

President/CEO

Winning Edge Network

Published on LinkedIn January 17, 2023

For more information about tools to use against incivility, contact https://civilworkplace.nih.gov

We welcome your views, comments, ideas, and suggestions.  Our goal is to be a forum for all that is relevant, topical, engaging, and helpful.  Should you wish to comment or even submit something for our blog, with your permission, we’ll review, and likely publish it.  You can reach us at

in**@wi****************.com

 In the interest of privacy, we will use only your first name for attribution.  Your email address will not be shared or published.

Thanks for stopping by!